Hocus Pocus the Piltdown Man was a Hoax(us)


Image result for piltdown hoax

1. The Piltdown Hoax was a false discovery of the possible "missing link" between humans and apes. The jaw of the subject was cut, removed, and the teeth were filed down in order to look human. But it was, in fact, the jaw of a young orangutan. The skull was completely unrelated to the found jaw, and much of it was purposefully stained after being fossilized. It was found in the early 1900s in Sussex, England, which is why it was so popularized because they foolishly thought the ancient ancestor of humans lived in Britain, therefore making it the birthplace to humanity. The scientific community found it to be revolutionary, though some had their suspicions that they kept to themselves. The Piltdown Man was "found" by Charles Dawson, who was thought to be the suspect of the falsified find.

Related image

2. Humans are faulty, and science can't always be logical and concise fact when it is being altered and falsified for human reasons like fame or pranking or money. Because of this hoax, the scientific community was met with outrage and distrust. How could anything be found truthful when it could be a man-made lie?

3. But humans aren't only full of faults. They're also a curious bunch that strives to advance and progress further, whether it be humanity or the technology they create. Prof. Kenneth Oakley tested the "fossil" with his fluorine analysis. which was a crucial advancement in the scientific process. He could then date the fossil, which he found to be consideredably young. Where scientists thought the fossil was a million or so years old, it was in fact only a few hundred thousand years old.  The skull was ultimately found to be roughly five hundred thousand years old while the jaw of the orangutan was roughly six hundred years old. Because of this find, the scientists were able to pinpoint what was so strange about the Piltdown Man and progress such technology to be more accurate in the future.

Image result for piltdown hoax

4. It is impossible to remove the human factor from science. Curiosity and deceit make us human. It is also why scientific data is tested again and again and with different, more advanced technology in order to assure the hypothesis remains true. Lessons can be learned, and tricks can be avoided. Humans are the best counter to humans, so the human factor should never be removed.

Image result for life lesson

Humans are faulty, but they are also just as creative, curious, and determined (almost, ironically, to a fault). We can learn from mistakes as long as we learn the lesson. With the Piltdown Man, the lesson was to be fully accurate about the source. Many scientists at the time did, in fact, feel there was something off about the fossil, but they just didn't stand up to Dawson and Woodward. And the public largely didn't even question it. To learn from this lesson, the public and the scientists must ask more questions to get the scope of the full, true answer. Know your sources, and don't trust them at face value unless it is a truly credible source.


Comments

  1. Roxana I really liked your post, I think the pictures really tied everything together. I definitely agree with you, that the human factor in science should never be taken out. I am a strong believer in learning from our past mistakes and this can be applied in science too. Like you mentioned, there is no one better fit to discover more about humans than humans themselves. Great post and I also like your blog set up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great images!

    You have some good detail in your synopsis, but some clarification is needed.

    First of all, scientists didn't "foolishly think" human ancestors lived in England (let's avoid judgement statements in science papers). But England had not yet found a hominid ancestor on English soil, which other countries had, and British scientists really *hoped* to find one.

    Second, in the guidelines, it is specifically stated that the term "missing link" could not be used to describe the significance of this find. Did you review the information in the assignment module that explains why this term is not valid? Please make sure you go back and review this.

    So the issue of significance remains. Had Piltdown been valid, it would have helped us better understand *how* humans (not *if*) evolved from that common ancestor with non-human apes. Piltdown was characterized by large cranium combined with other more primitive, non-human traits, suggesting that the larger brains evolved relatively early in hominid evolutionary process. We now know this to be incorrect, that bipedalism evolved much earlier with larger brains evolving later, but Piltdown suggested that the "larger brains" theory, supported by Arthur Keith (one of the Piltdown scientists) was accurate.

    I would have also liked a little more information on this story. Who besides Dawson was involved? Why did the scientific community think this was "revolutionary"? And why were some skeptical? How was this hoax uncovered and how many years passed before that happened? What was happening in paleoanthropology during that time that led to Piltdown being re-examined?

    "Humans are faulty..."

    Yes, but you are asked here to be more specific. What human faults led the culprits to create this hoax? And what human faults may have caused scientists (particularly British scientists) to accept this fossil with so little of the skepticism required of them?

    "science can't always be logical"

    Science is just a tool. It is neither logical nor illogical. It is only as good as the person who wields it.

    Good discussion of the technology used to uncover the hoax, but what made scientists come back and retest Piltdown? What was happening in paleoanthropology in those 40 years that pushed them to re-examine this find? What aspect of science does that represent?

    I love how you tie in the positive and the negative traits humans bring to science. That is precisely the point. We can't do science without the curiosity, ingenuity and intuition of humans, but we can use the process of science to help weed out the inevitable harm that human faults create.

    Good life lesson.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Roxana I really enjoyed your life lessons on how we should always ask more questions to find out the truth behind some historical facts. You had a very detailed story about the hoax and it was very well written. Its sad however how some people are so greedy that they would create the hoax in the first place but since someone simply asked more questions and studied the skull they were able to disprove the theory of the "missing link".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm afraid I don't know who you are so I can't assign credit. Email me. You need to make sure you are logged into your Blogger account when you submit comments so your username comes up. Either that, or include your name in the comments.

      Delete

Post a Comment